Trinidad Community Assessment

August 31 – September 2, 2005

 

Final SWOT Analysis Assessment Report

September 23, 2005

 

Assessment Team

Darlene Scott - Office of Economic Development & International Trade

Clarke Becker – Colorado Rural Development Council

Lee Merkel – Department of Local Affairs

Steve Eggleston – Housing & Urban Development

Hazel Hartbarter – Arvada Economic Development

Elaine Mariner – Colorado Council on the Arts

Susan Stanton – DIA Partnership

Pete Roskop - Office of Economic Development & International Trade

 

Meghan Harris Russell – Trinidad/Las Animas County

Economic Development Director

 

 

Sponsored By

 Office of Economic Development & International Trade

&

Economic Developers’ Council of Colorado


Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

Community Assessment Schedule…………………………………………     Page    3

 

 

Session 1 – Downtown Development ………………….……………………   Page    5

 

 

Session 2 – Community Development……………………..……………….   Page   7

 

 

Session 3 – Infrastructure Development ………………………………….      Page   8

 

 

Session 4 – Business Development ………………………………………     Page   9

 

 

Recommendations……………………………………………………………     Page 10

 

 

Assessment TEAM Contact Information & Biographies…………………..    Page 12

 

 

 

Tentative Date for Follow-Up Community Assessment

March 1, 2006

 

 


 


Trinidad-Las Animas County Economic Development

Trinidad Community Assessment Schedule

August 31 – September 2, 2005

 

Wednesday – August 31st:

11:30 am               TEAM Members Arrive in Trinidad: 

               

1l:45 am                                Lunch:  The Home Front Restaurant

 

1:30 -5:30 pm       Community Tour:  TEAM members return to hotel following the tour

 

7:00 pm                 Community Leaders & Public Officials Dinner at Rino’s Italian Restaurant

 

9:00 pm                 Return to Hotel

 

Thursday – September 1st:

7:00 am                 Continental Breakfast at hotel

 

7:45 am                Transportation provided to the Trinidad State College

§         Preparation for the focus groups

 

9:00 am                Focus Session I:  Downtown Development

TEAM Leaders:  Hazel Hartbarter & Elaine Mariner

§         Downtown Revitalization (includes attracting businesses)

§         Inventory of Resources/Assets and Marketing

§         Incentives

§         Historic Preservation

o        Finances/Resources

§         Arts/Culture

§         Boutiques

§         Theatre/Music

 

10:30 am               Break

 

11:00 am               Focus Session II:  Community Development 

TEAM Leaders:  Susan Stanton & Darlene Scott

§         Vision & Identity:  Define the future development of the community

§         Arts/Culture

§         Boutique

§         Tourism

§         Recreation

§         Retirement Community

o        Health Care

 

12:30 pm               Lunch at Trinidad State College

 

1:30 pm                Focus Session III:  Infrastructure Development

                                TEAM Leader:  Lee Merkel & Pete Roskop

-          Water

-          Planning

-          Telecommunications/High Tech

-          Healthcare

-          Housing

-          Road Improvements

-          Transportation

-          Resources/funding, etc.

 

3:00 pm                 Break

 

3:30 pm                Focus Session IV:  Business Development

                                TEAM Leader:  Clarke Becker & Steve Eggleston

-          Incentives/finances/resources

-          Workforce Development

-          Education (K-12 & Higher Ed)

-          Renewable Energy

-          Community Cooperation, Coordination, Partnerships

 

5:00 pm                 Public Forum Adjourn

 

6:00 pm                 TEAM Member Dinner & Work Session

Friday – September 2nd:

 

8:30 am                 Trinidad State College

 

9:00 am                 Presentation of Community Assessment

 

10:00 am               Questions & Answers

 

10:30 am               Public Meeting Adjourned

 

10:45 am               TEAM Member Wrap Meeting & Luncheon at Main Street Bakery & Cafι

 


Trinidad-Las Animas County Economic Development

Trinidad Community Assessment Final SWOT Analysis

August 31 – September 2, 2005

 

Focus Session I:  Downtown Development      Hazel Hartbarter & Elaine Mariner

Strengths (in no particular order):

§         Historic Downtown

§         Brick Streets

§         Access to/from I-25

§         Museums

§         Architecture

§         Movie  theatre

§         Artists

§         Great supply of professional artists

§         Chamber of Commerce

§         Hispanic Chamber

§         Welcome Center

§         Capital investment, Street fronts/landscaping/street furniture

§         Trinidad Blues Fest

§         County Fair

§         Sante Fe Trail

§         Skate Park

§         River walk Park

§         Amtrak Stop

§         History tour/Trolley

§         History Walking Tour

§         Arts Center/First Street Art Gallery/youth programs

§         Zoning for business/live and work

§         Collective recognition of downtown

§         Theatre Company

§         Art Galleries

§         Restaurants

Weaknesses (in no particular order):

§         No city planner

§         Communication among various groups, organizations, and elected officials

§         No design guidelines to preserve historic buildings

§         Maintenance and security concerns in downtown

§         Need one stop shopping for business development (ombudsman)

§         Signage to main street

§         Highway curb appeal

§         Utilities costs are very high particularly downtown because of large buildings and old boilers

§         Pedestrian/foot traffic safety concerns

§         Lack of parking or signage to public parking areas

 

Opportunities:

  • Venues to display and sell fine arts
  • Big buildings
  • Celebrate multi-cultural/heritage including festivals
  • More capital investors
  • Develop partnerships with organizations
  • Engage commissioners for county-wide support

Threats:

  • No design guidelines
  • No city planner
  • Museum facing environmental and security risks

Focus Session II:  Community Development    Susan Stanton & Darlene Scott

Strengths (in no particular order):

  • Corazon de Trinidad – Heart of Trinidad - a tagline
  • Trinidad State Junior College (TSJC)
  • Sante Fe Trail and Trade/Merchant Heritage
  • Many tourism assets
  • Welcoming of newcomers
  • Nursing Program at TSJC
  • River Walk project
  • Unique hospital procedures
  • Natural resource employment
  • Tolerance of diverse lifestyle and cultures

Weaknesses (in no particular order):

  • Not “a lot” of things to do, lots to see
  • Limited public land and recreational opportunities
  • Lack of skilled workforce
  • Children aren’t here because the jobs are not here
  • Promotion and availability of tourism marketing plan
  • Lack of quality healthcare
  • Housing is expensive

Opportunities:

  • Cougar Canyon Development
  • Improved coordination and trust
  • Retirement Community
  • Large number of retirees looking at Trinidad, many are working retirees, extremely active and want to be part of the communities.
  • To capture the drive-by market on I-25.

Threats:

  • Cougar Canyon Development
  • Local government history of political conflict
  • Lack of diversity in the economic base
  • Perception of unique hospital procedures
  • General outside perception of the community
  • Loss of TSJC if legislative funding is not passed or available

Focus Session III:  Infrastructure Development   Lee Merkel & Pete Roskop

Strengths (in no particular order):

  • Secured water rights
  • TSJC
  • North Peak Elementary School, including arts and music programs
  • Hospital
  • DSL and satellite in Trinidad
  • Distance education online and K-12
  • Control of water resources
  • Amtrak and rail lines

Weaknesses (in no particular order):

  • Inferior telecommunications infrastructure including voice mail; switch, etc.
  • The community does not have the benefit of O.B. facility available at the hospital.
  • Difficulty in attracting physicians
  • Not enough doctors
  • Lack of outpatient facilities
  • No landscaping guidelines
  • Lack of affordable housing
  • Lack of multi-family development in 10 years
  • Water resources outside the city limits

Opportunities:

  • TSJC intends to add wireless telecommunications
  • City regulations for water conservation
  • Leverage resources through partnerships and collaboration
  • Build a community relationship with hospital management, including credibility between board members and the community.
  • Identify alternative solutions to provide medical services for citizens
  • Mill levy on the tax payers to support the hospital

Threats:

  • Losing hospital and services
  • Non-completion of I-25 interchange
  • Mistrust among various organizations including hospital management
  • Need of residential rental properties
  • Unplanned school enrollment/decline

 


Focus Session IV:  Business Development, Clarke Becker & Steve Eggleston

Strengths (no particular order):

§         Strong and connected workforce development center (extensive services)

§         Customized training through TSJC

§         Full employment

§         Network council meets monthly to  coordinate and share information

§         TSJC pursuing OEDIT Colorado First training funds as a business incentive

§         Hotel development projects

§         Enhanced Enterprise Zone

Weakness (no particular order):

  • Under employment
  • Workforce housing that is affordable for the people that work in LAC
  • Inability to maximize the tax benefits of the gas industry

Opportunities:

  • Attract families through adequate  workforce housing
  • Alternative energy
  • Potential with the coal industry
  • Resources available through Office of Energy Management
  • Continue researching biomass development.

Threats:

  • Gas industry primary employer
  • Potential reduction in future workforce in gas drilling
  • New industrial park businesses are related to gas industry

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recommendations

The following recommendations should be considered for future strategic planning purposes.  It is recommended that a few of the most immediately “do-able” recommendations be selected for action while a more detailed strategic plan addresses longer term action items.

Focus Session I:  Downtown Development

  • Create a funding district for downtown improvements. City and county need to develop financial incentives for building preservation.
  • Create design guidelines to protect the integrity of downtown.
  • Use the TSJC resources to facilitated discussions:  invite and embrace everyone, build trust; accountability, chart a course, take ownership with a goal to identify the single entity to guide the downtown and county-wide partnerships.  The single entity is recommended to be the TLAC economic development organization.
  • Celebrate and leverage your diverse cultural heritage and creative assets.
  • Improve website through linkages and website visibility.

Focus Session II:  Community Development

  • Identify steps to make attractions “visitor-ready” and establish a creative marketing plan.
  • Review the master plan for impacts from the new development (infrastructure, schools, downtown businesses, police, fire, healthcare, government services, etc.)
  • Diversify and target the industry in the industrial park.
  • Expand the trail system and the recreation center/tennis courts, etc.
  • Create partnerships with commercial real estate professionals

Focus Session III:  Infrastructure Development  

  • Investigate and collaborate to create better ways to serve the modern medical needs of the community.
  • Develop official/efficient water landscaping guidelines.
  • Support TSJC efforts to create the high speed wireless internet system.
  • If the local provider is not serving the telecommunications needs, the elected officials should identify community solutions.
  • Empower staff and fund the economic development organization to implement the strategic plan for the community.
  • Open the lines of communication between the community and the hospital.   It is critical that both groups collaborate for the greater good.